Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: commonone   😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Ok IDF whoop butt
Date: 10/07/23 4:08 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
mechinv: Biden decided to unfreeze the money to secure the release of 5 US prisoners held in Iran. The money was supposed to be monitored to make sure it was used for humanitarian purposes such as food, medicines, etc. I do agree that this money could have fallen into the wrong hands...

Okay. I wanted to stay out of this conversation but since Dope1 is accusing others of having "a 3rd grader's knowledge of politics and world events" and incorrect information about the "$6 billion transferred to humanitarian organizations in Iran" has entered into the conversation, please note: confirmed earlier today by a National Security Council Spokesperson, not a single cent from those funds has been spent yet, and when it is spent, it can only be spent on things like food and medicine for the Iranian people or the funds will be frozen again.

mechinv: That $6B was money that the US owed to Iran anyway for US purchases of Iranian oil.

No. The funds were payment for South Korean purchases of Iranian energy products, primarily condensate, and have sat idle in two South Korean banks. In theory, Iran should have been able to use that money for humanitarian purchases all along. But in practice, the money was inaccessible because the Korean government and banks were concerned about violating U.S. sanctions.

Incidentally, it was the Trump administration that allowed waivers that enabled the Iranian oil sales that generated the $6 billion in the first place.

washingtoninstitute.org - Iran hostage deal clarifying billion transfer

foreignpolicy.com - Trumps big iran oil gamble sanctions waivers end pompeo trump iranian oil exports imports what impact politica
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to commonone here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community