Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: The two-pronged goal of the tariff actions
Date: 04/08/25 12:34 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
It's clear that Trump wants to isolate China and start forcing the re-alignment of the Western economies away from their influence.

Then why the tariffs against Chinese manufacturing competitors? Or against the Western economies?

If you wanted to isolate China, you would impose whopping tariffs against China...and not against countries like Vietnam and Japan, who are competing against China to supply countries in Asia (and globally) with manufactured goods. A huge part of China's competitive advantage is scale - so you want to create incentives for relocating manufacturing out of China into low-cost countries that aren't China. You also wouldn't impose tariffs against all the countries in the region whose cooperation we need in order to contain China - why are you punishing Australia and South Korea and Cambodia and Burma and Laos and the Phillippines with massive tariff increases? You also wouldn't impose whacking high tariffs against the rest of the Western economies, because doing that only creates economic incentives for them to increase their exposure to Chinese influence, and burns their electorate against feeling friendly towards the U.S. It's hard to be the leader of a re-alignment of Western economies against China if you're kicking all those Western economies in the teeth with 10x tariff increases.

Again, maybe this is a goal that someone trying to find an after-the-fact justification for the completely thoughtless tariff structure might land on, as a rationalization for an utterly irrational economic policy. But it doesn't really make sense, and it's inconsistent with nearly every other part of the tariff program other than the China tariffs.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community