Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", mungofitch asked the members: "As for why the purchases stopped (for a while), perhaps the recent acquisition was seen to be somewhat counter to the capital allocation plans that Mr Buffett thought had been promised?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: OrmontUS ✭✹🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4624 
Subject: Re: Diane Swonk inflation thread @ BlueSky
Date: 10/16/26 12:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
The problem with the population at-large is that they either never understood what was "taught" when they were exposed to economics at school - or never were exposed in the first place.

Inflation is to prices as acceleration is to velocity.

If you stop increasing the speed, it doesn't mean that you automatically slow down. When you add more speed by accelerating, it means your steady-state speed is now faster.

Similarly, inflation is the rate of change in prices, not the finite price. The prices "never" (other than in extreme circumstances) go back down to what they were before they were increased by inflation. Politicians are fond of saying they will "stop inflation" with the perception to voters that this means that prices will be reduced to those in "the good old days" which is a naïve wish. It is true that, in some circumstances (say an end to the Iranian challenges) a component of the steady-state prices can go down, but those are external events beyond the control of central banks.

The above is obviously over-simplistic. It is likely understood by most politicians (who are not always as dumb as they appear) and only reenforces how duplicitous they are when they pander to the ignorance of the population.

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,615 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community