No. of Recommendations: 4
WiltonKnight: LGBT-QAEDA and TRANS-TALIBAN can't force a web designer to construct same sex wedding websites.
Good.
Plenty of vendors who are more than happy to do it - the Mullahs just want to force their will.
Ignoring the rather silly trolling, I have questions:
1. How did the Christian right group Alliance Defending Freedom gain standing for its client, 303 Creative?
First, no one asked 303 Creative to create a wedding site. When contacted by a reporter, the "Stewart" named in the case (who, incidentally, is a designer too) says he never asked 303 Creative to make a wedding website for him. He said at the time the case was first filed, he was married (to a woman) and had a child. He said: "I'm married, I have a child -- I'm not really sure where that came from? But somebody's using false information in a Supreme Court filing document."
2. 303 Creative had never designed a wedding website and its own website six months prior to the lawsuit being filed in 2016 does not include any of the Christian messaging that it did shortly afterward and today.
So why would Stewart, who lives in San Francisco and insists he never contacted 3030 Creative, choose a website designer in Colorado that never designed a wedding website?
3. Judges always refuse to answer hypothetical questions during confirmation hearings, so how did they accept a case before the court based on a fiction?
4. There's a rumor that ACB, Alito, and Kavanaugh have direct or indirect connections to the Alliance Defending Freedom group. Anyone have any information on this claim or can it be dismissed as unfounded?
