Post #14934 by mungofitch on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 8

I'm sorry, I still can't understand what you are doing.

Your analysis suggests that intrinsic value was only 35% more than book value in 1999 (when market prices was around twice book value), and had risen over time as the market price became a lower and lower multiple of book. I just can't think of what you're doing with the data that leads you to this conclusion.
Can you explain the underlying principal as if to somebody stupid?

(as an aside, the buybacks at high P/B last year are known to be from a long time shareholder, so presumably have nothing to say about management's thoughts about fair value. The highest P/B paid for buybacks that were not from long time shareholders is, I believe, about 1.48 in Feb 2022)

Jim

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.