Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |
Author: Umm 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: El Salvador Controls Their Gang Problem
Date: 02/27/23 7:59 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
"I suggest getting a variety, since every outlet will have some bias as to what they choose to cover or not cover. None can cover everything, so what they choose to cover is already a bias. NYT, NPR, Guardian, BBC, surprisingly you can get decent coverage from al Jazeera. I don't do cable news, so can't recommend any of them (and would recommend against them). VICE News can be good. There are probably some others if I thought hard about it. But those sources will call BS on a Dem or a Rep when they are spewing BS. Which is their job. I want to know the dirt, no matter whose dirt it is. I also like some international sources as they have different perspectives on American news, and are generally not carrying the banner of either US party."

What I think is more important than the sources of information a person uses is how they consume the information from those sources.

Whenever I read/watch/hear a story from a news source my mind automatically questions the information I am being given. I try and figure out how the source would be biased and take that into account. I try and understand why they are framing the information in the way they are framing it. I consider if there is information they are not telling me that might have an impact on my thinking if I knew about it (that is where diverse multiple sources are important). Short answer, the consumer should be critical of the information they consume and the news sources they consume it from. It is called critical thinking for a reason.

You probably do this in general as well without even really thinking about it.

Unfortunately there is a large segment of the population that does not do this. They either lack the knowledge, curiosity, or desire to think critically about the information they consume. Those types of people are more likely to fall prey to confirmation bias and use those sources of information.

Now to be fair, everyone falls prey to confirmation bias on occasion. It is human nature to want to have our views confirmed. The ability to recognize it and move beyond it is what makes the difference. Some people find a greater need for confirmation bias than they do for factual information.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Umm here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community