Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |
Author: g0177325   😊 😞
Number: of 48481 
Subject: Re: The true meaning of the "right to bear arms&q
Date: 07/18/2023 12:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
I have the same question about "well regulated militia", to me that seems to mean
that rules and regulations can be applied to gun ownership. But the "right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" seems to contradict that.

https://www.google.com/search?q=2nd+amendment+text...
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."


Yes, but if "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" is just an "artful" (and quite unfortunate) alternative way of describing a "well regulated militia", the 2nd amendment boils down to only militias not being infringed, and thereby says absolutely nothing about individual gun ownership rights. Pretty much every household owned guns at that time didn't they? So it simply might have been unnecessary to belabor that obvious fact.

That is, the 2A would merely state that every state has a right to have a well-regulated militia, nothing more.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds