I've noticed you keep going back to "total elimination". But that simply can't happen. The 2A will prevent that. So that isn't even on the table.

But there is, or should be, a lot of stuff we can do that is short of that, but still accomplishes a lot of good. The other poster gave you a list of some of them which did not involve taking a single gun.

I think both Heller and McDonald were wrong, but I doubt the current composition of the Court will agree with me. In fact, the case albaby mentioned is probably a loser (even though you seem to agree it would be a reasonable prohibition). Also, the list the other poster provided likely would be a non-starter. I would add to that list that a firearm cannot be gifted to another. The person has to buy it him/herself with their own biometric data (fingerprints, etc).

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.