Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: Said   😊 😞
Number: of 21937 
Subject: Re: Safer to diversify?
Date: 06/06/23 5:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
dtb, sorry for the - hopefully not too bad - joke with the "programmers language". I just couldn't resist. Here is info about it directly from the IRS:

irs.gov - Some nonresidents with US assets must file estate tax returns

irs.gov - Estate tax for nonresidents not citizens of the united states

As the first link says: Estate tax treaties between the U.S. and other countries often provide more favorable tax treatment to nonresidents by limiting the type of asset considered situated in the U.S. and subject to U.S. estate taxation.

But that of course depends on the individual's country of residence. New Zealand for example has no inheritance tax and because of that no double taxation treaty with the US covering such. Therefore if one partner of a New Zealand couple who has all of their assets in BRK dies their whole assets, all of their BRK stock, is subject to the full 40% US inheritance tax instead of the New Zealand 0% and the surviving partner gets just 60% of what they owned together.

There are ways around that. If you know you'll die as Blackswanny says liquidate everything before and transfer it - in this example - to New Zealand.

Another way is this tip which a fellow board member once gave me: As this law applies to legal persons only one can get around it by setting up a structure where not a person but a different entity, a trust or so, owns the US assets, the BRK shares or whatever. When the person dies it does not constitute an inheritance case because the owner is the trust, and that trust did not die.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Said here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community