Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: mechinv   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: RSP vs. SPY
Date: 12/22/23 10:11 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
The equal weight index is the winner over the cap-weight index on both fronts, so RSP isn't too bad as a one-ticker portfolio.

We'll have to agree to disagree, and that's fine. You do you. Be happy in RSP, and avoid index funds.

As for us - meaning the vast majority of American investors - the reasons why index funds are better for us are:

1) We can't even find RSP as an investment option in our 401K retirement plans

2) We have our capital in index funds compounding tax free in our 401ks. RSP in a taxable account would incur taxes on dividends and sales.

3) RSP had worse drawdowns compared to an index fund in every single bear market since 2003. For example, it was down 30% in the recent 2022 bear market compared to 27% for an index fund.

4) An index fund delivered a better risk-adjusted return compared to RSP over the past 20 years.*

5) Index funds have about 1/4 the expense ratio of RSP. We're cheap. We like that.

* I measure risk-adjusted return using the Sortino ratio. The Sortino ratio is calculated by comparing an investment's average return rate to the risk-free rate, and then dividing the result by the standard deviation of negative returns. The higher the Sortino, the better the risk-adjusted return. Below are the metrics over the past 20 years.

SPY vs RSP over past 20 years (since 2004)
CAGR Sortino
SPY 9.41% 0.87
RSP 9.36% 0.79
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mechinv here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community