Post #24947 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Agree...but this seems like one of those things that might pass by and no one notices. Trump might be eyeing RFK for HHS head also.

I kind of doubt that. At least not for the real right-to-life wing of the party. This is their issue, and they pay a lot of attention to it. If this was the only thing, maybe it wouldn't land as hard. But between the Comstock Act refusal, Vance's statement about vetoing a national ban, and Trump's allusion to "reproductive freedom" in his tweeting....he's been softening the ground on this. Naming a pro-choice person the Secretary of HHS would be a huge blow to them.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.