Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Walmart really passing on the tariffs to consumers
Date: 07/25/25 5:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 17
Original price--$1.00 (2023).
Up a bit 2024---$1.12 to $1.17.
Start of 2025---$1.67 (chocolate demand up a lot and prices worldwide up about 50%).
New price(07/24)$2.44 (tariff-included price--up 46.10+% based on non-tariffed price).


Thanks for the data point.

Back of the envelope:
Walmart's gross mark-up on consumables might be in the vicinity of 25%. So if the price at start of this year was US$1.67, they might have a cost basis of around $1.33? Shipping is negligible at their scale, so their import cost basis might be around $1.30. (I am making this up as I go along). It's hard to keep track of the changes multiple times per day, but I think the current tariff rate is about 20% on EU-source foods. So the tariff increase might have added around $0.26. Assuming they need the same margin on ALL their costs, that might bring sales price to a nice round $2.00. But you're seeing $2.44.

So, we can guess that the rest of the increase in price is for other reasons. One of which is simply that the US dollar has fallen a lot this year. IF the supplier kept their wholesale price constant in euros, (certainly not an obvious assumption for supply to a buyer with the power of Walmart) that would probably explain it. The US dollar has fallen more than 11% against the euro so far this year, and nearly that much against most other majors.

The scarcity of cacao may be one reason that chocolate sellers aren't cutting their margins to keep selling prices the same...at some point, it's better to take a hit to volume and market share than to take a loss. I think there are probably many vendors who are, for the moment, doing what Mr Trump wants: cutting their own margins to keep end user prices in the US constant. But that can't last. Nobody is in the business of losing money forever.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,453 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community