Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: John Oliver Weighs In
Date: 07/10/24 7:01 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
So why on earth would Trump lift a finger to help Heritage pursue their policy preferences?

It wouldn't be to help Heritage pursue their policy preferences. It would be to help Trump pursue his own preferences.

Let's say Trump would like to enshrine his Schedule F executive order into law rather than just an EO. That is something I'm fairly sure he would like. Perhaps he needs a few more Republicans to back it, and they are holding out for a nationwide abortion ban. So he'll let them add the abortion ban to the bill to get their votes for Schedule F.

The Heritage foundation has given Trump a list of potential bargaining chips to use to get votes he might need in Congress.

Of course, don't get too worked up over my choice of issues to pair up. It's just an example. It could be any issue that Trump wants paired up with any issue he doesn't care much about but that other Republicans might care deeply.

The point is that there are a good number of Republicans who would back the various bits of Project 2025 that Trump is ambivalent about. And that could easily lead to a fair amount of Project 2025 coming to pass, even though Trump isn't advocating for it.

And that all comes back to Trump caring only about Trump. The parts of Project 2025 that aren't good for him now could easily become useful for him in the future - not necessarily because those are things he wants, but they can become the currency to buy votes or do favors in exchange for something else that he does want.

--Peter

PS. I'm going to continue pointing out that the worst parts of Project 2025 are also the ones Trump wants for himself. These are the parts that would put a severe strain on Democracy itself.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community