Post #27717 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

I think Peter addressed most of this.

Bill Clinton wasn't convicted of anything. Which is why he wasn't penalized in any way. Having consensual sex (oral or otherwise) with another adult doesn't interest me. The convict had sex with a porn star. Don't care. That's between him, the porn star, and his wife. I think it's in poor taste to cheat on a spouse, but not disqualifying.

Committing fraud is another matter.

Obviously, you are free not to vote. However, I think Peter made an excellent case for voting against the convict precisely because it is to the long-term benefit of the country. I also made a few of those points in my previous post.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.