Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤ | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤ | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |
Author: wzambon 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 77903 
Subject: Re: The TACOrettes keep coming
Date: 05/22/26 1:20 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Re: probability of Soviet invasion of Japan in 1995

(Also from the net sifter)

Limited Lift: Even with American aid, the Soviets only had enough specialized transport and landing craft (like LCI-Ls) to lift and land roughly 10,000 troops at a time. For comparison, the U.S. landed 60,000 troops on the first day of the Battle of Okinawa.No Heavy Lift: The Soviets completely lacked crucial equipment like Landing Ships, Tank (LSTs) and amphibious tractors, which were vital for delivering heavy artillery, tanks, and continuous supplies.

Lack of Amphibious Doctrine and Experience

River vs. Ocean: The Red Army was the world's master of land warfare and river crossings, but they had almost no experience organizing and executing massive, long-range, over-the-shore ocean invasions.


On the other hand, the American fleet sat off the shores of Japan with over a million men ready to storm ashore. They had the craft to get them ashore, the beans and bullets to sustain an invasion, and the battleships, cruisers and aircraft carriers to mount a supportive bombardment.

The USSR possessed little to none of these resources
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds