Please be patient and understanding when interacting with others, and avoid getting frustrated or upset if someone does not respond to your posts or if a discussion does not go as you expected. Remember that everyone is entitled to express their own perspectives. Furthermore, even when you don't entirely agree, try to benefit in some way from it.
- Manlobbi
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
No. of Recommendations: 4
No. of Recommendations: 7
Utter effin' insanity. All the stars are aligning to get Trump - a very special boy - back in office.
This will be instantly appealed to the Eleventh Circuit. Stay tuned...
No. of Recommendations: 1
Yep. It'll be appealed, but we've now thrown distance into the resolution. The stars are not aligning for us.
No. of Recommendations: 7
I found this:
Judge Cannon’s ruling came exactly two weeks after Justice Clarence Thomas deeply questioned the constitutionality of Smith’s appointment in an odd concurrence in the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling granting Trump broad immunity against criminal prosecution.
No. of Recommendations: 1
"Dumb Cannon Exonerates Loose Cannon"
No. of Recommendations: 1
Judge Cannon’s ruling came exactly two weeks after Justice Clarence Thomas deeply questioned the constitutionality of Smith’s appointment in an odd concurrence in the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling granting Trump broad immunity against criminal prosecution.
And yet somehow her ruling comes in at a whopping 93 pages of dense legalese and prior case citations. Which sure makes it seem like she's been working on this for much longer than two weeks. Perhaps she's been in communication with certain Trump friendly Supremes for quite a while.
No. of Recommendations: 12
And yet somehow her ruling comes in at a whopping 93 pages of dense legalese and prior case citations.
"Dense legalese" would appear to be the perfect description of any prose written by Cannon on any subject. No other court has held that the Special Counsel statute is un-Constitutional. No one in Trump Administration 1.0 objected to using the Special Counsel statute to appoint an investigation into Comey. The claim now being made by Trump's counsel (and likely campaign) that tossing this case will "un-do" the "weaponization" of the Justice Department and particularly the Special Counsel statute is completely antithetical to the "logic" of Cannon's reasoning. She tossed the case because she didn't think the Attorney General (and thereby the President) had ENOUGH control over the actions of the counsel, calling into question the legitimacy of any action taken by the Special Counsel because he was not appointed by the President or confirmed by the Senate.
The only consistency to be found in this ruling lies in its incompetence and corruption.
WTH
No. of Recommendations: 7
Did you expect anything else from Cannon? Evidently, it is commonly agreed among lawyers/judges who comment on such things that she is utterly incompetent. They are mystified by her rulings, and wonder why she talks two months to make a decision that should take 5 seconds.
IMO, she is a convict Trump lackey that is doing everything she can to get his charges dismissed. And if convict Trump wins in November, those federal charges will go away (possibly forever). Or he'll just pardon himself.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Sweet!
Now onward to dismissed the felony phony baloney nonsense by a Kangaroo Court.
No. of Recommendations: 2
She tossed the case because she didn't think the Attorney General (and thereby the President) had ENOUGH control over the actions of the counsel, calling into question the legitimacy of any action taken by the Special Counsel because he was not appointed by the President or confirmed by the Senate. - WTH
-----------------
Would you favor a system where an AG can pick a random civilian citizen and grant him the powers of a US Prosecutor backed by the treasury of the United Stated. Would you feel different if Garland had just picked Dope and set him loose. I kinda like that image.
No. of Recommendations: 1
And yet somehow her ruling comes in at a whopping 93 pages of dense legalese and prior case citations. Which sure makes it seem like she's been working on this for much longer than two weeks. Perhaps she's been in communication with certain Trump friendly Supremes for quite a while.
It seems quite possible that someone is writing this stuff for her and telling her what to do.
