Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (144) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: WHY does Israel have to wait for
Date: 08/13/24 1:02 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
And the US Navy. The Houthis have said they deliberately targeted a US Navy destroyer. Again, for Iran there is little risk unless we hold them responsible for the actions of the Houthis.

Even so. They've mostly avoided directly attacking military ships, which vastly lowers the risk of this escalating.

The Iranians do face little risk of retaliation for sponsoring a proxy. That's why nations use proxies for fighting. It allows conflict without a hot war between major powers. The Iranians accept the limitations of what such a conflict can achieve - harassing shipping lanes only to the ability of the Houthis, which is vastly less damaging than if the Iranian navy and air force were attacking vessels directly. But that lowers the costs to them of engaging in it. We do it, too - it's why we support Ukraine but aren't bombing the Russians ourselves.

We could escalate the costs to the Iranians....but only by vastly escalating the costs to ourselves, since that would detonate both the Red Sea and the Gulf. The Iranians sponsor the Houthis just enough that it's not in our interests to hold them responsible for the actions of the Houthis. They keep their support low enough that it would be a mistake for us to escalate the conflict.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (144) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community