Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (149) |
Author: musselmant 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 6131 
Subject: Re: Chart: timing with Nas100 RS screen
Date: 06/14/26 12:36 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
I have let winners run since using real money and won big (MU up over 500% since October). I am testing on Norgate data on Chatgpt now; so far not only do tests show that wise, but even using sales proceeds to buy more if still on the list adds another 4.4% cagr! All major fronts, sharpe, beta, UI, recovery time better than SPY, NDQ, better than 9-12 month momentum, better than price/(hi price 52 weeks + low price 52 weeks).

I don't agree doing what is simple to look up is best. 9-12 month mo works but 9 is best in backtests; there is nothing special about 200 days or 1 year. Googlesheets can do your calculation instantly with no effort beyond checking additions to Nasdaq100 since you last looked.

And in my tests using SPY as the timing mechanism, and 325 days beat using NDQ/QQQ and beat 200 days. 300-350 days all were good and prevented whipsaws that shorter SMAs caused.

And while reducing drawdowns is #1 goal it is not suspicious if it also improved other metrics, just a good thing. Why not have your cake and eat it too, Marie be damned.

The overlaps are simply better than either list, and 5 beats 10 stocks by quite a lot.

The recovery is better than with SPY or NDQ.

And tests work post 1999, just not as well as 1985-forward. I haven't even included post April 2026 yet! I am making a killing this year.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to musselmant here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 6,115 posts about Mechanical Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
Dividend investing · 52 recs · 2025
Non-Mag7 screen · 34 recs · 2025
OT - Div yields and returns · 32 recs · 2024
Using AI to generate backtesting programs · 30 recs · 2025
Rankings for 19Dec2022 · 29 recs · 2022
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (149) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community