Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Author: sano 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48501 
Subject: 'I'm so confused'
Date: 11/07/2023 1:42 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
SCOTUS considers firearms possession by violent individuals. Astounding that they are even considering restoring the right of people who are mentally unstable to possess firearms.

Several conservative justices, during a lively if largely one-sided argument, seemed to be searching for a narrow rationale that would not require them to retreat substantially from a new Second Amendment test the court announced last year in vastly expanding people's right to arm themselves in public.
--------------------------
Chief Justice Roberts said there was little question that Mr. Rahimi, who has been accused of a string of shootings, posed a threat to public safety.

'You don't have any doubt that your client is a dangerous person, do you?' the chief justice asked Mr. Rahimi's lawyer, Mr. Wright.

Mr. Wright said he would 'want to know what 'dangerous person' means.'

Chief Justice Roberts supplied a definition. 'Someone who is shooting at people. That's a good start.'

'I'm so confused,'Justice Amy Coney Barrett said.


Poor Amy.

Perhaps she could call another Trump appointee, Judge Eileen Cannon for guidance.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/07/us/politics/sup...



Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds