Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: The Republican Health Care System
Date: 07/02/25 4:26 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
Aaaaaand these aren't the people being targeted with the work requirements.

But those are people that will be hit with the work requirements.

I understand that the idea, or maybe the goal, is that only the deliberate shirkers will be thrown off Medicaid. But that's not what the law actually does.

That's the problem with these efforts. The population is an undifferentiable mix of people who are the sort that conservatives imagine they are targeting with these kinds of laws (the Willfully Indolent) and the people who cannot meet these work requirements. So when conservatives talk about the effect of the law, they imagine (and talk about) the people in the first group. When liberals talk about the effect of the law, they imagine (and talk about) the people in the second group. There are both Goofuses and Gallants that will be hurt by this measure.

Plus, there are lots of people who aren't receiving Medicaid that will be hurt by it as well - because Medicaid coverage of all these desperately poor people is what keeps a lot of hospitals and medical systems from collapsing in rural high-poverty areas. Those are often areas where education levels and access to jobs and transportation are lower than average....so imposing these types of requirements results in proportionally large numbers of hospitals and medical systems no longer being able to get revenues or reimbursements from treating these patients, and they fall apart.

You're ignoring why that is. The hint is that the drug problem in rural areas is just as bad as it is in the cities. Plus, the way to fix the problem in rural areas is not to increase the amount of public dole but rather to reconstitute many of the industries that have been outsourced to other places.

Regardless of whether that's either true or possible, that doesn't make your initial statement accurate. The people who are crippled by the horrors of the drug problem aren't people who "can work but choose not to." Nor are all the other people whose educational levels, physical or mental condition, or lack of transportation or housing or other material resources make it impossible for them to hold down a steady job....or to regularly complete the paperwork required to document their employment every six months.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community