Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Why the border bill will fail
Date: 02/08/24 1:36 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
We know that NOW. But.... Russia's GDP is 29% military hardware and they aren't shabby at missiles, drones, etc. If you would tone down and be serious, Putin thought military hardware and numbers overcomes incompetence and he didn't understand how incompetent his army had become. Neither did we.


You need to look at their tactical and strategic position. Yes, that's a serious subject. Not sure why you don't think it is. Understanding strategic conflicts begin with understanding your adversary's goals, incentives and ability to project power.

What are Putin's goals? His goal is to re-unify what was once the Soviet Union and re-make them into a global power.

What are his incentives? His incentives are to solidify his power base by uniting his people under a nationalistic sense of pride for Mother Russia. Would distract from any problems in their real lives - this was how the Soviet Union worked - further helping him keep power.

What is their ability to project power? Abysmal. They can't even subdue a lightly armed neighbor, much less face NATO.

Having said all that, should be blow them off? No. NATO nations should have military readiness in case Putin were to start something as a favor to China, who is the real adversary.

And we should take it seriously. Can we handle two flashpoints and the Ukraine?

No, and this is the crux of the ammo shortage. We need more ammo plants built with the ones we have running 24/7/365.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community