If we're no longer going to do what's good for the world, but instead do what's good for us, then a lot of countries need to modify their relationship with the U.S. to be more like any other power. Which means no longer relying on us to do what's right or good or in service to global interests.

A wonderful post, albaby (as usual), but I think you may have missed something (or perhaps I’m misreading - like that’s never happened before 😁).

When our previous leaders did “what’s good for the world”, we weren’t just being altruistic. I think they believed that if the world was more prosperous and had fewer military resources (atomic weapons, armies, etc.), that the United States would be better off as well.

On a personal level, I serve on the Board of a local non-profit that focuses on improving the living standards of inner city residents. I do it partly because I want to “give back” to the community where I prospered (somewhat altruistic) but more importantly, I believe if the living standards of people in our community improve, my life is better, too. More productive citizens that pay taxes, less crime, etc.

One of Trump’s many flaws is that he believes he can only win if he wins and you lose. Apparently he is unaware that win-win scenario’s can be beneficial.

Just my thoughts.