No. of Recommendations: 10
What is inarguable is Joe Biden enabling the influence peddling and the White House covering it up.It's not inarguable. I'm arguing it. Joe Biden
didn't do anything to enable the influence peddling.
He didn't enable it. Joe Biden didn't
do anything that enabled Hunter Biden's influence peddling. He was Hunter's father, and had personal and social interactions with Hunter - which is something that is permissible and appropriate. That's not
enabling influence peddling - and Joe Biden was under no obligation to cut off contact with Hunter Biden just because Hunter Biden's out there doing unseemly things. Joe's obligation is to not exercise his office in a way that violates the law, and not to isolate himself from his son.
If even 1% of this stuff was alleged about Trump there would be national campaigns to try him for treason, and you know it.There would not be - because there weren't. Good government folks were all upset over the fact that Trump didn't divest himself of all of his international holdings and business ventures, because those all created the opportunity for foreign governments to confer benefits/exercise pressure on Trump monetarily. For example, see below:
https://archive.ph/AzRF5Trump wasn't brought up on charges for treason, of course. And even when they were
impeaching Trump, they didn't include anything on those business deals. Because while it's
unseemly for the adult children of the President to be pursuing business ventures in foreign countries while their father is the President, it's
not wrongdoing on the part of the officeholder.
