Post #13897 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Also, it gives states an opportunity to push for modifications that serve their unique labor needs. This is particularly true for states in which agriculture is a major economic component.

There are scads of bills that have been passed and then modified over the last 75 years. Recently, for example: - sano

-----------------

Sure, modifications and underway all the time as it should be, no problem with that.

What I am questioning it your sides apparent claim a sunset clause has to be in the initial bill to enable the bill to be modified in the future. I mean it is OK to defend the sunset, I just don't think "so it can amended later" is a good defense.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.