What correct information?

A correct assessment of the evidence that the prosecution had and the actual legal arguments that were being made. Just look at what you’ve written in this thread. From your posts, it appears that you believed that it was the payments that had to conceal the crime, that it was wrong to allow a federal crime to serve as a predicate crime, that the tax crime was Trump’s and not Cohen’s, that Cohen’s federal taxes were at issue and not his state ones, and that the judge’s ruling on testimony wasn’t. only barred legal argumentation.

All of those things were wrong. So it’s no wonder you might wrongfully conclude Trump was railroaded. There’s a lot of pundits who didn’t bother to learn the details of the case (and that includes Dersh, sadly) who went out and spouted a lot of nonsense about weaknesses that didn’t really exist. So, had they given a more accurate assessment, the public would have a better understanding of the trial.