No. of Recommendations: 5
Taking satellite photos out of the SCIF is enough intent right there, in Hillary!'s case. You're also seriously arguing that Hillary!'s server didn't represent document retention in an unauthorized place.
You have proof that Clinton was the one who took the satellite photo out of the SCIF? I would expect nearly all of the instances of classified information in her servers came from people sending it to her. But I'm open to being shown that's not the case.
Do you know where the highest concentration of innocent men are on Planet Earth? Answer: any jail. How do you know? Answer: Just ask them.
True, but irrelevant. For a specific intent crime, you need to prove that they had the requisite knowledge and intent. Absent evidence, you can't convict. So you have to prove that Biden knew there were some classified documents in a box in a closet in his old office at the think tank. Not an easy thing to do.
You're not allowed to waltz into the NRO, ask to see stuff in a SCIF, then say, "Hold on a second, I need to forward this to my bathroom server". No. Doesn't happen.
Again - any evidence that this is what happened? That Clinton entered the SCIF and forwarded classified material to herself? That she was the one who removed it?
