Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of ETFBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of ETFBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Index Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: rayvt ✧☼🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 293 
Subject: Re: Favor - request for help
Date: 05/18/25 10:23 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
What is the point of having a significant ex-US companies?
* To have a company that is headquartered outside of the USA?
* To have a company which does business and gets revenue from non-US countries?

When I go to an Italian or Mexican restaurant, I don't care if the cooks were born in Italy or Mexico. I want the food to be typical of that country.

Google "XXX non-us business share",
with XXX the name of the top few holdings of the S&P 500.


"Apple's business is significantly international, with a majority of its revenue coming from outside the United States. "

"Microsoft's non-US business share is a significant portion of its revenue,"

"Nvidia's non-US business represents a significant portion of its overall revenue, with key markets in Asia and Europe. "

"In the first quarter of 2025, Amazon's non-US business, represented by the International segment, accounted for approximately 21.5% of the company's total net sales. "

"Meta's business is significantly international, with a substantial portion of its revenue and user base coming from outside the US and Canada.
...
Meta derives about 55% of its revenue from outside the U.S. and Canada. May 5, 2025"


With large companies, you are already getting a very large exposure of revenue that comes from non-US sources. You don't really need VEA or ACWX.

My reason for investing is to make the largest amount of money. The backtests I posted tell me that investments in a specific ex-US fund are contrary to that goal. They get you exposure that you already have and they reduce your returns.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to rayvt here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 289 posts about Index Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
S&P500 valuations · 31 recs · 2023
S&P500 sales growth & multiple · 22 recs · 2025
Software equal weight - XSW · 12 recs · 2025
Welcome! · 4 recs · 2022
Shrewd Sam vs No-risk Ned · 2 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
Index Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of ETF | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy