Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: TOP SECRET//NOFORN
Date: 07/30/23 4:04 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
...there's no need to go further.

You should have gone further. He explained why those weren't "mendacious lies", and then refuted every point you made. To put it bluntly, he thrashed your post with verifiable facts and data. Instead of engaging in conversation, perhaps attempting to find errors in his post, you just posted a one-liner dismissive which didn't really contribute anything.

I think your view is colored by what you see in Seattle. The other poster provided national data, but I think you are mostly seeing Seattle policies that result in more open drug use and vagrancy in downtown Seattle. I can understand that, especially if you're confronted with it daily. But Seattle is not the entire nation. Maybe Seattle is screwed up; I dunno. But the facts of the Biden successes in this first term are quantifiable and verifiable. At least the ones the other poster mentioned are.

As is the Republican preference for corporate socialism, as the other poster explained. Not that Dems are immune to that since corporations are big campaign contributors, and Dems want to get reelected, too. Reps may not favor socialism that benefits the common man (e.g. universal health care), but they are totally on-board with privatizing profits and socializing losses for Big <insert industry here>.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community