Post #36787 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (216)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 11

Are they saying that there was no warning, or no permission?

Some have claimed either or both.

They clearly knew that the Administration was intending to send these aircraft, because they were told they couldn't do that before the aircraft entered Colombia airspace. But like Mexico, they told the Administration that they were not granting permission for the use of military aircraft.

Because, of course, that's a reasonable position for a country to take. Not to allow military aircraft to be substituted in for civilian purposes for no reason. Mexico is much bigger, and more important to the U.S., than Colombia so they were able to make their objection stick. But it's absolutely a reasonable thing for a country to raise in the first place.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (216)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.