Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: Umm 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Well, how about that bitcoin
Date: 07/05/24 12:00 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
"Here and elsewhere Syke6 has patiently explained (most recently on the Berkshire board) to enthusiasts why Bitcoin will not soon (probably never) become the reserve currency, basis for a monetary system, etc. - most of it boiling down to “it’s volatile.”

Its volatility is mostly because it is so scarcely traded.

And yes, before some Bitcoin enthusiast sprouts off on the daily volume of Bitcoin, it is scarcely traded compared to actual currencies. Bitcoin trading volumes are tiny, small, miniscule, fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the volume that real currencies such as the dollar do. If Bitcoin trading volume was even just 10% of the dollar, it's volatility would drop.

However, it is literally impossible for the volume of Bitcoin trading to be 10% of volume of dollar trading. There is simply not enough electricity generated on this earth to power computers to calculate and record the transactions to come anywhere close to that level of trading volume.

The distributed nature of blockchain so attractive to its enthusiasts is what makes it so horribly inefficient (and therefore expensive) to trade the mass volumes required to be a currency.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Umm here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community