Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Hey Tommy Tuberville...
Date: 07/13/23 10:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
There were more Democratic votes for the CRA than Republican votes - in both the House and Senate.

Erm, there were more democrats in both chambers of Congress. The GOP voted for the CRA in higher percentages.

Immediately after the law was passed, the GOP chose a Presidential nominee who had opposed it (Barry Goldwater).

Oooo, nice try. Goldwater wasn't a racist, but statements like this purport to indicate that he was.
Goldwater also challenged his party's moderate to liberal wing on policy issues. He supported the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960 and the 24th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, disagreeing with Title II and Title VII.

In other words, it wasn't a perfect bill and he opposed sections of it. Were he some kind of racist he would have opposed the earlier versions.

Say. 1957. Who was President then?

eisenhowerlibrary.gov - Civil rights act.

In 1957, President Eisenhower sent Congress a proposal for civil rights legislation. The result was the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the first civil rights legislation since Reconstruction. The new act established the Civil Rights Section of the Justice Department and empowered federal prosecutors to obtain court injunctions against interference with the right to vote. It also established a federal Civil Rights Commission with authority to investigate discriminatory conditions and recommend corrective measures. The final act was weakened by Congress due to lack of support among the Democrats.

There's all those civil-rights minded democrats at work right there.

Support for civil rights among many democrats - LBJ chief among them - was due to political expediency, nothing more. That's true today, btw.

'I'll have those <really bad word>s voting democrat for the next 200 years'.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community