Post #5062 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Dope1: All they're going to have is the above circumstantial stuff...

Dope, I believe eyewitness testimony isn't circumstantial. So there's a memo outlining "how to" on the fake electoral slates. Fake electoral slates were submitted to the archives. So you get an eyewitness on the memo, eyewitnesses on the submission, eyewitness on the meeting in the White House, etc., etc., etc. So everything can be tied together and linked back to Trump? We shall see.

You can cast doubt on it all you want to, but it isn't up to the vote of a partisan Senate this time. And Donald can't get a Federal pardon. Trump has appeal rights, and Clarence is still on the courts, so you have a chance that way too. Not everyone is corrupt.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.