Post #42422 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

But if someone accepted that argument - as you did - it would mean that participants like Rubio and Wiles and the others would be criminally responsible, since they had deliberately chosen to transact official work on unsecured devices.

And this is you trying to use my argument against me…just as I said. Jiu-jitsu.

Problem is:
None of that would include the reporter, who should not have anticipated that simply being a Signal user would result in him being included - by accident

…you can’t call for Rubio and the others to be jailed and avoid the reporter.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.