Post #15690 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

I mean, that's the point, right? If the choices of manufacturers and consumers were going to land in a place where we had 60% EV's by 2032 (or whatever the percent is), then you wouldn't need a regulation. You only need the regulation in order to change the amounts and prices of the ICE vehicles that manufacturers offer, relative to the amount and prices of EV's.

This x1000. You don't get to claim "The market has spoken"! when you're the one literally dictating to the market what it can produce and offer to consumers in the first place.

EV demand is slowing to the point where automakers are walking back their previous statements around full electrification. You're seeing some production lines paused or shut down and more of a shift towards hybrids again.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.