Post #4420 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

From your link: Most seriously, the inspector general assessed that Clinton's emails included information that was highly classified -- yet mislabeled as unclassified. And the information wasn't mislabeled, it was later up-classified.

Knowing you make this bogus arguement, I covered this.
Again: Material like that is BORN CLASSIFIED IN A SCIF, and somebody would have had to have scrubbed the marks and pulled it out of the air-gapped system.

One more time: Tell me you don't know anything about classified material without telling me you don't know anything about classified material.

In the meantime: Keep flying that Hypocrisy Freak Flag, just like I said you would.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.