Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: More EU views on the trade deal
Date: 07/29/25 1:05 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
The EU, as currently constituted, cannot and will not be able to act as an independent power, much less as a pole, in multipolarity. It must change.

Except they probably don't want that.

When the U.S. switched from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution, it basically switched from being a collection of independent countries that had a tight military and economic agreement to becoming one country. The States retained part of their sovereignty, which is part of why the U.S. operates so differently from other countries. But we went from something very much like a modern EU/NATO arrangement into a single national state.

Europe isn't likely to ever take that step. For a time, it was a belief among One World Order conspiracists and the like that the European Common Market --> European Union --> Adoption of Euro as currency would eventually lead to a single European country, as a precursor to forcing all the world's nations to merge into a single World Government. But while the ECM --> EU --> Eurozone has led to much greater economic integration, it hasn't really promoted anything close to the integration you saw with other national integration projects back in the day (the U.S., the unifications of Germany and Italy in the late 19th Century, etc.). Folks seem to like having some degree of correspondence between the "People" they belong to and national borders, and the Germans and French and Spaniards etc. don't appear to have any great desire to all be living in a single country the way that the early New Yorkers and Pennsylvanians and Virginians were willing to do back in 1789.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community