Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: A Quick Reminder
Date: 12/20/24 12:16 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
It's hardly a secret that Trump doesn't want a bill that's going to handcuff his first year, hide documents that he wants exposed, bloats the budget, funds censorship, and adds loads to the debt.

So what? It was also hardly a secret that Johnson has to get Democratic votes to pass the bill, and that the bill would therefore include some of their priorities. Almost every bipartisan bill is going to include things that the other party might prefer not be in the bill - and omit stuff off the President's wish list.

It's up to Trump to let Johnson know what his priorities are. Does he want the bill to just pass without a whole lot of kerfuffle? Does he want the bill to include a debt ceiling provisions? Does he prefer to suck up the stuff he doesn't like in order to avoid having to spend time and political capital managing a shutdown fight, or does he want Johnson to go in a different direction?

Part of Presidenting is taking an active role in managing that stuff, rather than just leaving other parties to try to guess what you want. If you don't like the way a bill is going, then say something.

So why bring that 1,500 page monstrosity up at all? I don't believe this was a serious bill, ever.

It was dead serious - Johnson went into the week expecting it would pass. Why bring it up? Because the GOP doesn't have enough votes to pass a CR on its own, and needs Democratic votes in the House. Because the Senate is still controlled by the Democrats, so they need Democratic votes in that chamber as well. Because members of their own caucus were insisting that they wouldn't vote for the CR unless it had hurricane and farm provisions. Etc.

If your caucus won't support a clean CR, then you can't pass a clean CR. So you have to cut a deal.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community