Post #26965 by g0177325 on the Mechanical Investing board

When reading posts, there are yellow stars against the names of the most respected Shrewds. The number of points in the star, starting at 3, represents the Shrewd'm-Star rating. This number is the average recommendation that the author received over the last 12 months.

- Manlobbi

Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (57)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

We need a bridge to get from here to there [100% renewable energy]. Oil and gas is the only way to get us there.

Well, personally, I think nuclear fission is the way to go. The new types of small module reactors and molten salt water reactors are very clean and safe now. Hell, they can even put one in my literal backyard and I wouldn't mind. But popular opinion has been against nuclear since Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima. Fusion is still a pipe dream: 15 years off at least at best.

I've been following Copenhagen Atomics designs, which use thorium as fuel:

https://www.copenhagenatomics.com/technology/

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (57)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Mechanical Investing FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.