Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: weatherman   😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Cliff's Notes for a Corrupt Supreme Court
Date: 02/06/2024 2:12 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
so it seems this brief is making a strong 'originalist' case for clearly marking trump no longer a qualified candidate.

no problem, Clarence & The Originalists will come up with a new name for the band.

the only consistency i see from SCOTUS so far :
- it becomes 'state's rights' when they want to disrupt federal precedent
- it becomes federal authority when states exercise their rights and upset conservatives (if that word even has relevance anymore)
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds