Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: commonone   😊 😞
Number: of 84351 
Subject: Re: Biden Admin Dept of Education in the news
Date: 07/30/23 4:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
bighairymike: It is important that every taxpayer dollar be spent wisely on school programs that actually matter. If the schools were offering classes in drag queening, then no problem.

foxnews.com - Biden admin withh...

Biden admin withholding key funding for schools with hunting, archery programs


What is it with you guys and drag queens? Do they scare you?

Anyway, the Biden administration is adhering to the letter of the law:

The legislation included an amendment to an ESEA subsection listing prohibited uses for federal school funding. That amendment prohibits ESEA funds from helping provide any person with a dangerous weapon or to provide "training in the use of a dangerous weapon."

Hunting and archery clearly provide "training in the use of a dangerous weapon" which is prohibited of funding.

Here's the amendment:

§7906. Prohibited uses of funds
No funds under this chapter may be used-

(1) for construction, renovation, or repair of any school facility, except as authorized under this chapter;

(2) for transportation unless otherwise authorized under this chapter;

(3) to develop or distribute materials, or operate programs or courses of instruction directed at youth, that are designed to promote or encourage sexual activity, whether homosexual or heterosexual;

(4) to distribute or to aid in the distribution by any organization of legally obscene materials to minors on school grounds;

(5) to provide sex education or HIV-prevention education in schools unless that instruction is age appropriate and includes the health benefits of abstinence;

(6) to operate a program of contraceptive distribution in schools; or

(7) for the provision to any person of a dangerous weapon, as defined in section 930(g)(2) of title 18, or training in the use of a dangerous weapon.

So if the Biden administration adheres to the letter of the law, you complain that it violates the spirit of the law. But if the Biden administration were to follow the spirit of the law, you'd complain that it violates the letter of the law.

The solution? Write clearer laws.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to commonone here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community