Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Trump: I Would Encourage Russia...
Date: 02/13/24 6:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Senator Lankford absolutely beclowned himself by trying to deny the 5,000 migrants/day wasn't actually in the bill. Being dishonest is one thing, being dishonest when everyone KNOWS you're lying makes him look stupid at the same time.

Because it wasn't in the bill. It wasn't 5K migrants per day being allowed into the country. It was 5K encounters - meaning that when Border Patrol encountered someone who wasn't claiming asylum and they were immediately thrown out of the country, it still counted. What leaked was people claiming that the bill would codify allowing 5K people per day into the country, which was totally false.

If that bill didn't have the 5,000 trigger in it it would have PASSED.

You can't say that we're never again accepting an asylum application, from anybody ever again, ever.

That's what the trigger kicked in. Refusing to even accept an asylum application. It wasn't that until 5K people came in we couldn't do anything. We would continue to be able to do everything we do now, including expedited removals for non-asylees, whenever we can do it now. The only thing subject to the 5K trigger was the complete moratorium on accepting asylum applications (again, in possible violation of international human rights law).

I know that there were some folks out there that believed the trigger meant we just let the first 5K people walk into the country, but we've been talking about it enough that I know you don't believe that. There's no way that Johnson would have killed the bill over just the trigger.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community