Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (82) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84360 
Subject: Re: ELON! With Sorkin
Date: 12/01/23 2:30 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
If you want to test whether Twitter's algorithms actually prevent major brand's ads next to pictures of Hitler, you need to set up an account that will have pictures of Hitler into it. They're not testing whether typical users will frequently - or even ever - see pictures of Hitler. They're testing whether the Twitter "speech not reach" algorithms will prevent the ads from being put next to Hitler. It's not really relevant whether there were 5 or 5 billion non-Hitler posts on the site at the time; what they're testing is what the software does with the Hitler images.

Media Matters wrote some code with the express intent of finding a corner case on Twitter where you could see Hitler or something next to an iPhone ad or whatever. After running through a billion tries they got something like 3 hits and then launched their PR campaign.

The PR campaign had the specific intent of smearing X and making the claim that, "Look, advertisers, your images are going to appear right alongside Hitler!!". That's not illegal although it is 100% sleazy.

Musk's Twitter changed that policy, allowing the Hateful Conduct (and the posters) remain on site - but claimed that it had precautions in place to protect the major brands from being exposed to the Hateful Conduct

Correction: Old Twitter's "Hateful conduct" stomped on speech from the right side of the aisle. New Twitter's Hateful Content is intended to actually target hateful content.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (82) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community