Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (144) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: WHY does Israel have to wait for
Date: 08/13/24 1:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
But let it be clear, an attack by proxies will be treated as an attack by Iran.

You can "let it be clear" that an attack by proxies will be treated as an attack by Iran only if that's true. And it's not.

It's a bluff. Iran knows we're not going to start a direct war with them over Houthi attacks on commercial shipping. Because they know that, they're not going to stop supporting the Houthis - whether we "let it be clear" or not. Because they know it's a bluff. We're not going to war with Iran unless they directly attack us - which is why they don't directly attack us.

Legally, politically, and diplomatically it is different when a nation's proxy attacks another country than if they attack directly. Which is why Iran can do this. They know - correctly - that no other nation on earth will treat the Houthi attacks on international shipping the same way as if these were Iranian attacks on international shipping. Because they're not the same. Supporting a belligerent is not identical to being the belligerent.

So Iran knows full well that an attack by proxies will not be treated as an attack by Iran, and they're not going to believe us if we say it will be. And since we're not going to go to war with Iran over this, making threats to that effect is not going to actually stop them.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (144) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community