Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: Senate Border Bill Details...
Date: 02/05/24 3:07 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Abbott is violating the current law. SCOTUS only rules on constitutionality, so all they can say is that the feds can remove the wire constitutionally. But Abbott is preventing BP agents from accessing people on US soil so that they can submit asylum claims. That is illegal. He should be tossed in federal prison.

Ironically, the new bill would make it legal with the 5000 person trigger, or rather, it would put the onus on the feds to do it. There is no "amnesty trojan horse" or any other such nonsense.

And you didn't point anyone to "actual bill text". You linked a moronic X post from a partisan moron. Numerous summaries are available, as well as the actual text (if you want to wade through it....I don't). But, please, feel free to point us to the actual text (not some X post) that gives a POTUS the ability to ignore the law. I would be genuinely interested. I'm sure if it were there you would be hearing the chunks for relevant text read aloud on FOX News already.

It gives Reps most of what they want. Certainly more than they will get if they wait until after Biden leaves office in 5 years, because they won't have Ukraine funding as leverage. So far, from what I've read, I'm OK with the bill. It's not exactly how I would have liked it, but I'm willing to compromise. But, hey, if you can live with the status quo (which apparently you can), I suspect I live with it better than you. And I'm in a border state.**

So, yeah, give Trump his campaign issue. Reps are like the dog chasing a car. You've actually caught it, and now you don't want it.



**Well, technically you are also. But I don't hear much commotion from the northern border.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community