Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: WendyBG x2🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Spending too much on AI?
Date: 11/26/25 10:47 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
The computer business, by definition, is a fast-changing business and always has been. Leaders are leapfrogged by new technologies. I remember using a Wang computer. Jeff could probably regale us for hours about the left-behinds.

Software can be easily superseded but at least it doesn't require massive capital investments. But companies that rely on hardware invest billions of dollars in manufacturing plants and data centers.

wsj.com - It really is possible to spend too much on AI


It Really Is Possible to Spend Too Much on AI
Tech giants are betting they won’t end up like Intel by overinvesting in computing infrastructure

By Asa Fitch, The Wall Street Journal

It has become a tech-industry truism: Spending too little on chips and other computing infrastructure for artificial intelligence is riskier than spending too much....

But investors have begun questioning this logic, fretting that the spending spree might be inflating a bubble that will inevitably pop. Indeed, spending too much can be very bad. Just ask Intel....

Overinvesting may have been the correct move for Intel in its circumstances then [2021]. But technological missteps and changed circumstances in the chip market undercut the effort within a couple of years.

The result has been nothing short of a disaster. Manufacturing projects have been put on hold or canceled. The company has been bleeding cash with free cash flow in negative territory in all but three of its last 14 quarters....

Large financial commitments to AI data-center projects might no longer make sense, becoming a burden for tech companies for years to come. If assumptions about the value of AI-related assets and contracts change, write-downs are also inevitable. A lot of startups could fail....
[end quote]

This is yet another warning about the dangers of the AI bubble.
Wendy
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WendyBG here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community