Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (203) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84349 
Subject: Re: NYC HS Students Forced....
Date: 01/10/24 6:46 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
The Borer patrol periodically announces they caught five or ten of them who were on the watch list. They never detail the split between walk up's vs caught skulking in the desert. Don't see how that matters. The point is they are present in the population and pose a danger to us, more-so the more you let in, it's a numbers game.

It matters, because while it is plausible that someone might want to sneak into the country, it's implausible that they would voluntarily submit to the asylum process rather than other alternatives (like flying in on falsified documents). Which makes it exceedingly unlikely that any Administration could convince a judge that suspending the asylum process is necessitated by a national emergency. Which is why even DJT didn't do that, even as he was claiming a national security need to impose other "travel bans" in 2017 and 2018. Because it's implausible that you would allow the massive and extensive amount of entry through airports and seaports, but find the asylum process too porous. Because again, unlike travelling through ports of entry, an asylee is not only evaluated by federal officials also, but is subject to immediate and indefinite detention for any reason at all for as long as the government wants.

There's no way you could convince a judge that asylum applicants (as opposed to people sneaking across the border who just get deported when they're caught) pose a greater likelihood of containing bad guys than any other mode of entry.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (203) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community