Be kinde to folk. This changeth the whole habitat.
- Manlobbi
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
No. of Recommendations: 4
would be heavily edited? Remember when the entire family would sit in front on the TV on Sunday nights to watch 60 minutes? I just deleted taping it, CBS is dead to me.
“ When asked by host Bill Whitaker why it seemed like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn't listening to the United States, Harris originally replied:
"Well Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region."
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/spliced-60-min...
No. of Recommendations: 4
No. of Recommendations: 2
" Is Fox "News" dead to you, too? Fox has edited Trump interviews."
So easy so predictable. Do you watch Hannity interview trump for medical advice? Harris had to convince voters she can complete a coherent thought in real time, she just can't do it. Check your favorite betting sites, the momentum is going toward trump. Dems should be embarrassed, for the third time we are struggling to beat trump. Time to flush the DNC toilet and reset.
No. of Recommendations: 0
common, do you actually READ what you share, or you just share headlines? Let me help you out,
" Fox News edited out a section of an interview last Sunday where former President Donald Trump appeared to retreat from a promise to declassify files related to sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein, Semafor reported. The exchange, part of a June 2 sit-down with Fox & Friends, was cut from the original TV broadcast but later reappeared in full on Will Cain's Fox News radio show.
A Fox News spokesperson, challenging claims that the network was protecting Trump, also shared with Salon another brief clip that showed the full Epstein segment, while not included in the original Sunday broadcast, was played on air the next day.
Asked whether he would declassify files related to 9/11, the JFK assassination, and Epstein, Trump asserted that he would — and on the TV broadcast, that was the end of it. The unedited version reveals that Trump was not so sure.
"I guess I would," Trump said. "I think that less so because, you don’t know, you don’t want to affect people’s lives if it’s phony stuff in there, because it’s a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would, or at least ... "
"Do you think that would restore trust — help restore trust?" the interviewer, Rachel Campos-Duffy, then asked in an effort to steer the former president back on course."
No. of Recommendations: 4
hclasvegas: Check your favorite betting sites, the momentum is going toward trump.
Great point, as usual. I've never heard of gamblers losing money.
No. of Recommendations: 2
" Great point, as usual. I've never heard of gamblers losing money."
The only sure thing is you. YOU will never admit that Joe should have retired a year ago so that the Dems could have nominated the most qualified candidate to beat trump. I give you a C for the course, you are Consistent!
No. of Recommendations: 3
C.BS HEAVILY edited that interview. They chopped up answers to make Harris look even halfway coherent.
No. of Recommendations: 12
C.BS HEAVILY edited that interview. They chopped up answers to make Harris look even halfway coherent.
That’s halfway more coherent than any Dementia Don interview, chopped up or not.
