Post #26988 by g0177325 on the US Policy board

Shrewd'm.com

A merry & shrewd investing community

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

Search Politics

Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

Search Politics

Come, dear reader, and join us
In our quest for sanity
For in the halls of Shrewd'm
We rid our vanity

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

There's usually a larger number of judges competing for a lesser number of seats. I google the names and see what comes up on them.

Except in this case, for each office, there are exactly the same number of candidates listed as you're allowed to vote for based on the "Vote for up to N" text for each office.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.