Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70) |
Author: musselmant   😊 😞
Number: of 6131 
Subject: Re: NDX 100 Momentum Strategy - Code Repository
Date: 04/16/26 6:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
AI summary: The strategy analyzed selects stocks from the Nasdaq-100 based on intermediate-term price momentum and holds them for short periods. The most robust configuration ranks stocks by approximately 9–10 month returns, buys the top 10 names, re-balances monthly, and shifts to cash when the S&P 500 falls below its 325-day moving average. Using historical data beginning in October 1993 and including modest trading friction, this approach historically produced approximately 29–30% annualized returns with Sharpe ratios near 1.0, substantially higher than broad equity indices over the same period. Importantly, roughly three-quarters of rolling one-year periods were profitable, meaning the strategy would have felt positive to investors in most one-year evaluation windows.

Extensive robustness tests suggest the results are not driven by a few exceptional trades or by the largest technology stocks. Performance remains strong after removing the biggest individual winners, excluding the “Magnificent 7,” delaying trade execution several days, or forcing the strategy away from the largest Nasdaq100 constituents. Diversified portfolios holding 5–10 stocks appear especially stable: they maintain strong returns while spreading gains across many positions rather than relying on a single extraordinary stock. In contrast, the most concentrated variant (holding only the top-ranked stock) produces higher theoretical growth but is far more dependent on rare outlier winners and is psychologically harder to follow.

The simple market-timing filter—investing only when the S&P 500 is above its long-term trend—meaningfully improves behavior in major bear markets such as the 2000–2002 dot-com collapse, the 2008 financial crisis, and the 2022 decline, reducing draw-downs and accelerating recovery. While it cannot eliminate losses during short, sharp corrections, it substantially improves worst-case outcomes over full market cycles. Taken together, the tests suggest that a diversified Nasdaq-100 momentum portfolio combined with a broad market trend filter captures a persistent momentum effect rather than merely riding a handful of mega-cap winners, producing unusually strong historical growth with relatively simple rules.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to musselmant here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 6,106 posts about Mechanical Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
Dividend investing · 52 recs · 2025
Non-Mag7 screen · 34 recs · 2025
OT - Div yields and returns · 32 recs · 2024
Using AI to generate backtesting programs · 30 recs · 2025
Rankings for 19Dec2022 · 29 recs · 2022
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community