No. of Recommendations: 9
Does it occur to you that there might be a viewpoint out there that says, "The government could be run more efficiently and more effectively by replacing some of these career chair-moisteners"?No. It looks like a fascist conservative viewpoint of installing Trump as an authoritarian. Possibly by the end of his reign voting will not be necessary. Read on:
An exhaustive manifesto for the next conservative US president produced by Project 2025, an initiative led by the hard-right Heritage Foundation, uses 'dehumanising language' about LGBTQ+ Americans too extreme even for candidates currently seeking the Republican presidential nomination, a leading advocate said.
In the words of Paul Dans, its director, Project 2025 is 'systematically preparing to march into office and bring a new army, aligned, trained, and essentially
weaponised conservatives ready to do battle against the deep state'.
...that 'army' has produced something solid:
Mandate for Leadership: the Conservative Promise, a 920-page document that sets out policy wishes across the breadth of the federal government. implementation of many Project 2025 recommendations would
rely on broad acceptance of unitary executive theory, a contested vision of strong presidential power, from a compliant Congress and supreme court.
Implementation of
'Schedule F', a plan formulated by extreme Trump allies to
purge the federal bureaucracy of officials deemed insufficiently loyal, would also likely be needed,
The Project 2025 manual '
purges the civil service of all (perceived) political 'enemies' [and] advises to
ignore checks and balances of the constitution. Pass it on.'
And this is just one article.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/15/proj...
